None of us are safe in a system that treats lies as official findings and abandons the rule of law in the process. Here is what the observable facts of the Renee Good shooting actually show, as distinct from the administration's account of it.
Shortly after the shooting, the Department of Homeland Security's use-of-force policy was redacted almost in its entirety. What remains publicly available on the agency's website is a single paragraph.
In a CBS Evening News interview, the president remarked that Good "under normal circumstances, was a very solid, wonderful person. But her actions were pretty tough." Being characterized as "pretty tough" should not be grounds for a summary execution by an agent of the state.
The Justice Department concluded that Good was a "terrorist" who had "weaponized" her vehicle, making her death a "justifiable" use of force. The Secretary of Homeland Security labeled the incident "domestic terrorism" within minutes. The vice president called her a "deranged leftist." The Assistant Attorney General overseeing the relevant criminal section confirmed there would be no investigation into the shooting at all.
Taken together with the observable facts above, this is a case where the official account does not hold up — and where the consequences of that gap, for the rest of us, should be unsettling regardless of one's politics. The clear message is that opposing or protesting this administration's policies now carries the risk of extrajudicial violence with no accountability attached.