About Our Broken Politics, Broken Media, Broken Republic

Understanding the distinction between these three terms is fundamental to understanding who has which rights under the Constitution.

"We the People" - The Preamble

The Constitution begins with perhaps its most famous phrase:

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

The deliberate choice of "We the People" rather than "We the Citizens" or "We the States" is profoundly significant. It establishes that sovereignty resides in the people collectively—not in state governments, not in a monarch, and not in any ruling class.

[U.S. Constitution - The Preamble]

What Does "People" Mean?

The term "People" in the Constitution is intentionally broad and inclusive. Courts have interpreted "People of the United States" to mean the collective body politic—the community of individuals who form the political society of the United States.

The use of "People" rather than "Citizens" suggests a broader scope. While the Preamble doesn't define who "the People" are, it establishes that the Constitution derives its authority from this collective body and that the government exists to serve them.

However, the term "People" appears throughout the Constitution with various implications:

- First Amendment: "the right of the people peaceably to assemble"
- Second Amendment: "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms"
- Fourth Amendment: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects"
- Ninth Amendment: "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people"
- Tenth Amendment: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people"

In these contexts, "people" generally refers to individuals within the political community of the United States, though the exact scope has been debated and refined through court decisions.

What Does "Person" Mean?

"Person" is used throughout the Constitution, most notably in the Fourteenth Amendment:

"No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

This distinction is crucial: The Fourteenth Amendment uses "citizens" when referring to privileges and immunities, but uses "person" when referring to due process and equal protection.

This means:

- Due process protections apply to all "persons" within U.S. jurisdiction—not just citizens
- Equal protection applies to all "persons" within a state's jurisdiction—not just citizens
- This includes lawful permanent residents, visa holders, and even undocumented immigrants while they are within U.S. jurisdiction

[U.S. Constitution - Fourteenth Amendment]

What Does "Citizen" Mean?

"Citizen" is the most specific category. The Fourteenth Amendment provides the constitutional definition:

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

This clause establishes two paths to citizenship:

1. Birthright citizenship (jus soli): Born in the United States and subject to its jurisdiction
2. Naturalization: The legal process by which a non-citizen becomes a citizen

The phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" creates limited exceptions, historically understood to exclude:

- Children of foreign diplomats (who enjoy diplomatic immunity)
- Children of invading enemy forces in hostile occupation
- Historically, members of Indian tribes subject to tribal rather than U.S. jurisdiction (though this has changed with subsequent legislation)

[Citizenship Clause Doctrine - Congressional Research]

Key Distinctions: Who Has Which Rights?

Rights Available to "People":

The Bill of Rights generally uses "people" or "person," suggesting these fundamental rights apply broadly. Courts have generally interpreted these to include:

- Freedom of speech, religion, press, assembly (First Amendment)
- Protection against unreasonable searches and seizures (Fourth Amendment)
- Protection against self-incrimination (Fifth Amendment)
- Right to due process (Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments)
- Right to equal protection under the law (Fourteenth Amendment)
- Protection against cruel and unusual punishment (Eighth Amendment)

Rights Specific to "Citizens":

- Right to vote (Fifteenth, Nineteenth, Twenty-sixth Amendments)
- Right to run for federal office
- Right to hold certain government positions
- Privileges and immunities of citizenship (Fourteenth Amendment)
- Right to enter and remain in the United States
- Right to federal protection while abroad

The Critical Difference: While citizens have additional political rights (like voting and holding office), all persons within U.S. jurisdiction are protected by the Constitution's fundamental guarantees of due process and equal protection.

Historical Context: Dred Scott and the Fourteenth Amendment

The Fourteenth Amendment's Citizenship Clause was a direct response to the Supreme Court's infamous decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857), which held that:

- African Americans, whether enslaved or free, could not be citizens of the United States
- They were "beings of an inferior order" with "no rights which the white man was bound to respect"
- Even free Black persons residing in states at the time of ratification were ineligible for citizenship

The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868 after the Civil War, explicitly overturned Dred Scott by establishing that:

1. All persons born in the United States are citizens
2. Citizenship is not limited by race or previous condition of servitude
3. All persons—not just citizens—are entitled to due process and equal protection

[Historical Background on Citizenship Clause]

Important Legal Precedents

United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898)

The Supreme Court held that a child born in the United States to Chinese parents who were ineligible for naturalization themselves is nevertheless a citizen of the United States entitled to all rights and privileges of citizenship. This affirmed birthright citizenship based on place of birth, regardless of parents' citizenship status.

Corporations and "Persons"

Courts have held that:

- Corporations are "persons" for purposes of due process and equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment
- However, corporations are NOT "citizens" for purposes of the Privileges and Immunities Clause
- This means corporations get some constitutional protections but not citizenship rights

As stated in Insurance Co. v. New Orleans (1870): "Citizens of the United States within the meaning of this Amendment must be natural and not artificial persons; a corporate body is not a citizen."

Current Controversies

Birthright Citizenship Debates

Recent executive orders have attempted to reinterpret the Fourteenth Amendment's citizenship clause, arguing that children born to undocumented immigrants or temporary visa holders are not "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States and therefore not entitled to birthright citizenship.

However, this interpretation contradicts over 125 years of legal precedent since Wong Kim Ark, which established that virtually all children born on U.S. soil—except those few narrow diplomatic and military exceptions—are citizens regardless of their parents' status.

[Executive Order on Birthright Citizenship]

Equal Protection for Non-Citizens

The Fourteenth Amendment's use of "person" rather than "citizen" in the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses means that non-citizens within U.S. jurisdiction are entitled to:

- Due process before being deprived of life, liberty, or property
- Equal protection under the law
- Access to courts
- Many (though not all) constitutional protections

This distinction is particularly important in immigration proceedings, criminal justice, and civil litigation involving non-citizens.

Why These Distinctions Matter

Understanding the difference between "People," "Person," and "Citizen" is essential because:

1. It defines who has which rights. Not all constitutional rights belong exclusively to citizens—many fundamental protections extend to all persons within U.S. jurisdiction.

2. It affects how we interpret constitutional provisions. When the Constitution says "person," it means something different than when it says "citizen."

3. It determines the limits of government power. The government cannot deprive any person of due process or equal protection—this is a check on arbitrary government action that extends beyond citizenship.

4. It reflects the Constitution's evolution. The Fourteenth Amendment fundamentally changed American citizenship and constitutional protections, moving from a narrow conception tied to state citizenship and race toward a broader, more inclusive definition.

5. It protects everyone from tyranny. By guaranteeing due process and equal protection to all persons—not just citizens—the Constitution ensures that the government cannot simply declare someone "not a citizen" and strip them of all protections.

Summary: A Hierarchy of Inclusion

The Constitution uses these three terms deliberately to create a hierarchy of inclusion:

"We the People" - The broadest category, representing the collective sovereign body from which the Constitution derives its authority. This is the political community that ordained and established the Constitution.

"Person" - Anyone within the jurisdiction of the United States, entitled to fundamental constitutional protections like due process and equal protection. This includes citizens, lawful permanent residents, visa holders, and even undocumented immigrants while within U.S. territory.

"Citizen" - A specific legal status conferred by birth or naturalization, carrying additional political rights and responsibilities beyond those guaranteed to all persons.

This framework ensures that fundamental human rights and protections extend beyond the political rights of citizenship. It prevents the government from creating a class of people who can be treated arbitrarily simply because they lack citizenship status.

The genius of this distinction is that it protects the most fundamental rights—life, liberty, due process, equal protection—for everyone within U.S. jurisdiction, while reserving certain political rights for those who are members of the political community through citizenship.